![]() | ![]() |
|
Why is the "Under God" line of the Pledge of Allegiance under Scrutiny?
After all of what has transpired in the last year, do we really need to go into the courts for the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of our United States of America? What the hell is happening with our own people? First
of all, and before I start, I would like you read after me:
O.K., now that we have pissed off some people in the west coast, let me just say that I am not sorry if you got upset. I mean, c-mon! Ever since I can remember, I have recited the Pledge of Allegiance with the pride and dignity that it deserves. I have never thought for one minute, the inclusion of God, being something that may impose one's beliefs and much less offend. Our country is a land of freedom and we should defend our liberties tooth and nail. America is also a democracy in which the majority rules. Most Americans believe in a supreme being or God. It is the reason why are money say "In God we trust". Now, Michael Newdow believes otherwise. He has pushed a law suit all the way to a federal appeals court to declare the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional. His biggest concern is the "under God" line is offending his Elk Grove Unified School 2nd grade daughter. A rulling was given in favor of Newdow in late June and revoked by the same California judge just as fast. What is going on in our country? The members of Congress, by the most part, acted outraged by the rulling. "This absurd decision was made by a court run amok," said House Majority Whip Tom DeLay, R-Texas. "This Congress is not going to let anyone strip our nation of our proud heritage — not now, not ever." This lame law suit should have not gotten as far as it did in our court system. The judge was asinine to rule in favor of Mr. Newdow. It is obvious that this guy just wanted to have his fifteen minutes of fame. What do you think of our Pledge of Allegiance? Should they eliminate or omit the part of God? and What is next America?
|
|
|
|